Missouri Cities Water Co. v. City of St. Peters
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
LAURANCE M. HYDE, Special Commissioner.
Action in equity in which plaintiff sought to have declared unconstitutional § 250.190, RSMo 1969, which authorizes a city to supply water and sewer services outside its corporate boundaries and to restrain the city from operating its water and sewer system beyond its limits in competition with the existing system of plaintiff in some areas. Defendant filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, which the court sustained and entered a judgment of dismissal. Plaintiff has appealed and we affirm.
Plaintiff, a…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Otter Tail Power Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State Ex Rel. City of Sikeston v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
- Missouri Electric Power v. City of Mountain GroveSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
- Speas v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
- Public Service Commission v. City of KirkwoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Coursen v. City of SarcoxieMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- Opinion No. (1985), Missouri Attorney General Reports1985
- Union Electric Co. v. City of JacksonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990