Legal Opinion
O'Connell v. Jacobs
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 11, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs. We agree for the reasons stated by the Appellate Division (181 AD2d 1064) that the admissible evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict.
Concur: Acting Chief Judge Simons and Judges Kaye, Ti-tone, Hancock, Jr., Bellacosa and Smith.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- O'Connell v. JacobsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jarvis v. EastmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Richbell Information Services, Inc. v. Jupiter Partners L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Wolff v. MahrerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000