Legal Opinion

Pittman v. Metz

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided September 20, 2012No. 47,320-CAPublished

1Opinion

ON REHEARING

Before BROWN, STEWART, DREW, MOORE and HARRISON (Ad Hoc), JJ. HARRISON, J. (Ad Hoc).1

We granted rehearing to reconsider our earlier opinion in this case. Finding that there was no coverage on the insured’s vehicle at the time of the accident because the insurer properly can-celled its insured’s entire policy for nonpayment of a premium, we now reverse the trial court judgment finding that Lawrence E. Metz2 was covered under the policy issued by Safeway Insurance Company of Louisiana.

Although the facts of the matter were set forth in detail in the original opinion, we will briefly…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Easley v. Firemen's Ins. Co. of Newark, NJLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
  2. Jones v. Allstate Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Lane v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API