Legal Opinion

Toledo, St. L. & K. C. R. R. v. Kingman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 6, 1893PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Memorandum.—Action for damages. Appeal from a judgment for plaintiff, rendered by the Circuit Court of Shelby County; the Hon. James A. Creighton, Circuit Judge, presiding. Heard in this ciurt at the November term, A. D.'1892, and affirmed.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court,

Boggs, J.

hire communicated to appellee’s premises from the engines of the appellant company, burned a stack of hay, some 1,(500 rails in a fence, ancl about eighteen acres of meadow. This action was instituted before a justice of the peace to recover the damages thus occasioned. The appellant company brought the case into the Circuit Court by appeal and this is an appeal from the judgment in favor of the appellee in the Circuit Court. The fires in question originated off the appellant’s right of way, and it is conceded that the evidence sufficiently shows that they were…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Railroad v. MillsIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. QuaintanceIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. LarmonIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  4. St. Louis, Vandalia & Terre Haute R. R. v. FunkIllinois Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Continental Insurance v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. Callaway v. SturgeonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API