Legal Opinion

Czuczka v. Rifkind

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 19, 1947PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

Ours is an appellate court, without power in ordinary circumstances to control the administration of the district court. We may not, by mandamus, interfere with that administration except in aid of our appellate jurisdiction. When a district judge arbitrarily refuses to hear a case, we may require him to do so.1 But here the judge merely denied a motion to expedite a hearing, and with leave to renew the motion in six months. It is irrelevant that, had we been sitting in the court below, we might not have been satisfied with the vague statement by the government officer of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schwab v. ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Knauff v. ShaughnessyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  2. Republic of China v. National City Bank of New York. Petition of Republic of ChinaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  3. Application of WeberDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API