Legal Opinion
Cox ex rel. ING Global Real Estate Fund v. ING Investments LLC
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided June 6, 2014No. Civ. No. 13-1521-SLRPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROBINSON, District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
On August 30, 2013, plaintiff Jeremie Cox (“Cox”) filed a complaint derivatively on behalf of ING Global Real Estate Fund (“the Fund”) against defendant ING Investments LLC (“ING”) alleging that ING breached its fiduciary duty under Section 36(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended 15 U.S.C. § 80a-35(b) (“Section 36(b)”), by charging the Fund excessive management fees. (D.I. 1) Presently before the court is ING’s motion to transfer this action to the District of Arizona. (D.I. 12) The court has jurisdiction over this…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- George Jumara and Evangelina Jumara, H/w v. State Farm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Norwood v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. University of Pennsylvania. Appeal of the Trustees of the University of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- In Re Link_A_Media Devices Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Smart Audio Technologies, LLC v. Apple, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- JACKSON v. BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INCDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2025
- Jackson v. BP Exploration & Production Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2025
- WHITTY v. BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INCDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2025
- Whitty v. BP Exploration & Production Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2025