Altman v. Amoco Oil Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Romiti
The plaintiff in this case filed an unsuccessful claim for libel after a creditor had turned a claim over to a collection agency and then caused him to have a bad debt or “09” credit rating, which was defined in part as “turned over for collection.” The trial court applied the rule of innocent construction, and found that one permissible interpretation was truthful. It further held that an amended complaint failed to state a cause of action. We affirm.
The action was filed by Sidney Altman, an attorney, pro se. According to the allegations in his complaint, Altman at one time had a credit card…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Tom Olesker's Exciting World of Fashion, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
- John v. Tribune CompanyIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
- Tom Olesker's Exciting World of Fashion, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
- Moricoli v. SchwartzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
- Hambric v. Field Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1964
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Chapski v. Copley PressIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
- Heying v. SimonaitisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- American Intional Hospital v. Chicago Tribune Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- American Int'l Hosp. v. Chicago Tribune Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- Emery v. Kimball Hill, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.