Legal Opinion

United States v. Hinkle

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided October 13, 2000No. NMCM 200000080Published

1Opinion of the Court

DORMAN, Senior Judge:

At a special court-martial, a military judge convicted the appellant, pursuant to his pleas, of a 21-day unauthorized absence and a violation of an order from his commanding officer, in violation of Articles 86 and 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 886 and 892. The approved sentence includes confinement for two months, forfeiture of $500 pay per month for two months, and a bad-conduct discharge.

We have carefully reviewed the record of trial, the appellant’s assignment of error, and the Government’s response. We conclude that corrective action is required.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  2. United States v. FisherUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  3. United States v. PeoplesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  4. United States v. ClaxtonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  5. United States v. LloydCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API