Legal Opinion

Ford v. Barcus

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 9, 1968No. 52507PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice.

This is an action commenced in equity by an employer and his workmen’s compensation insurance carrier against a former employee to set aside a memorandum of agreement as to workmen’s compensation and for restitution of funds paid thereunder on the ground they were fraudulently procured. Defendant’s special appearance asserting the trial court was without jurisdiction and the controversy belonged exclusively before the industrial commissioner was overruled. Following trial, judgment was entered for plaintiffs. Defendant has appealed. We affirm.

Defendant relies on three…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Syester v. BantaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
  2. Scheel v. Superior Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  3. Phoenix v. StevensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  4. Rathbun v. BaumelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  5. Comingore v. Shenandoah Artificial Ice, Power, Heat & Light Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Holden v. Construction MacHinery CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  2. Cornell v. WunschelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
  3. Hall v. WrightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  4. Wilden Clinic, Inc. v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  5. Kunkle Water & Electric, Inc. v. City of PrescottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API