Legal Opinion

Baum v. Concord Land & Improvement Co.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1913No. 3718Published

Appeal from Conejos District Court. Hon. Charles C. Holbrook, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment against the plaintiffs in an action for the specific performance of a contract. The judgment should be affirmed.

The plaintiffs sued for the specific performance of a contract made in September, 1909, in substance as follows : Monte Yista, Colorado, ........, 19.. Sec. 17, Tp. 38, R. 9, Conejos county. Title stands in name of Concord Land & Improvement Co. Number of acres, 640. Lowest net price $25 (per acre). Terms of sale, one-half cash, balance one to two years. Lowest amount to bind the bargain $500. That defendant agrees to furnish abstract and make a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rude v. LevySupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  2. Salomon v. WebsterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1878
  3. Winter v. GoebnerColorado Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Talcott v. MastinColorado Court of Appeals · 1905
  5. Davis v. ThomasSupreme Court of Colorado · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API