Legal Opinion

Rosser v. Terminix International Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 4, 2001No. Appeal No. C-000292, C-000578, Trial No. A-9904309PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Painter, Judge.

Plaintiffs-appellants Tom and Sharon Rosser signed a termite-protection contract with the defendant-appellee, Terminix International Company. The Rossers became dissatisfied with the services provided by Terminix and sued for breach of contract. But the contract that the Rossers had signed contained a mandatory arbitration clause that obligated the parties to submit any dispute arising from their contract to binding arbitration. For this reason, the trial court ordered the parties to arbitration and granted Terminix’s motion to stay the Rossers’ suit. The Rossers appealed, and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Zivich v. Mentor Soccer Club, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Doe v. ShafferOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Horton v. Harwick Chemical Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Phillips v. Philip Morris Companies Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API