Legal Opinion

Woody v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided November 22, 1913No. A-1830PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Major County; James B. Cullison, ’ Judge. W. A. Woody was convicted of adultery, and he appeals-

1Opinion of the CourtFurman, J.

First. In their brief counsel for appellant complain at a number of the instructions given by the court and also complain of remarks alleged to have been made by the county attorney in his closing argument to the jury. Upon an examination of the record, we fail to find that any exceptions were reserved at the trial to the instructions of the court. We also fail to find that counsel for appellant during the closing argument of the county attorney, in any manner, objected to the remarks complained of in the brief and alleged to have been made by the county attorney. We find no fundamental…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Thayer v. ThayerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  2. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. State v. BriggsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  4. Ostendorf v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. State v. DonovanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Roberts v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
  2. Signs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. People v. AlleeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  4. State v. RichardsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
  5. People v. KulandNew York Court of Appeals · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API