Legal Opinion

Ivey v. Eastern Cotton Oil Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 24, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBeogdeN, J.

The only question of law presented is whether there was sufficient evidence -of negligence to be submitted to the jury. The sole element of negligence relied upon as a basis of liability is whether the cotton seed caved in, thus precipitating the body of plaintiff’s intestate into the funnel where he was smothered by the crushing flow of the seed. The evidence, however, does not disclose a slide of seed at the time the body of plaintiff’s intestate was discovered. Indeed, .the un-contradicted testimony tends to show that the fork used by the deceased was standing up in the pile of seed at or…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. . VinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1869
  2. Byrd v. Express Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. Wittkowsky v. WassonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
  4. Pangle v. . Appalachian HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Warwick v. Lumberton Cotton Oil & Ginning Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. . ShelnuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API