Legal Opinion

Lansford v. Gloyd

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 8, 1923No. 11172PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranson, J.

The plaintiff in error appeals by filing in this court a petition in error and attaching thereto a transcript. The cause was entitled “J. XJ. Lamonte and J. H. Morgan, Plaintiffs, v. Sidney Ijansford, V. G. Hagaman, and S. M. Gloyd, Defendants,” in the district court. Both the plaintiff in error and the defendant in error were, sued as defendants in the court below, and the matters here arose there by cross-petition. The plaintiff in error here will be referred to as the plaintiff, and the defendant in error here will be referred to as the defendant.

It is necessary to state' briefly the facts…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bartlesville Oil & Improvement Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Parks v. Classen Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  2. Lashley v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Nicholson v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Stone v. RitzingerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  5. Cullins v. ElerickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API