Legal Opinion
Mazant v. Visioneering Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided October 4, 2007No. 06-30758UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM: *
Defendant-appellant Visioneering, Inc. appeals the district court’s judgment in favor of plaintiffs-appellees on their Louisiana products liability action, arguing (1) that the district court abused its discretion in reconciling the jury’s special verdicts and (2) in the alternative, that the jury’s reconciled verdict is unsupported by the evidence presented at trial. For the following reasons, we AFFIRM.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff-appellee Paul Mazant and Jeannette Mazant, individually and on behalf of Kendall Mazant, filed a personal injury products liability…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v. Ellerman Lines, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- James Snyder, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Sidney Trepagnier, City of New Orleans, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Mary GLASS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PETRO-TEX CHEMICAL CORP., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Hiltgen v. SumrallCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- McKinney v. Superior Van & Mobility, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2021