In re New York, S. & W. R. Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, District Judge.
As appears, unusually elaborate findings of fact and conclusions of law have been filed in the case at bar. As does not appear, but as is the fact, these were put in final form after several sessions in open court. Therefore they should, we hope, be of more than ordinary assistance to an appellate court. Because of that hope, we confine ourselves to an opinion stating what seems to us the general principles that should govern.
A curious shift in attitude pervades the pertinent course of decision. Originally a common law monstrosity, Littleton, Tenures, sec. 446, the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Central Trust Co. v. KneelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Hinchman v. Point Defiance Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896
- Georgia Southern & Florida Railroad v. Mercantile Trust & Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. New York & Queens County Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Marfield v. Cincinnati, D. & T. Traction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.