Wilson v. State
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
1Concurrence
ROBERTS, J.,
specially concurring:
¶ 21. I concur with the majority’s well-reasoned opinion. However, I feel compelled once again to write separately to address a matter not raised by either party but glaringly apparent from the record — the circuit court’s clearly unlawful sentence. In so doing, I reiterate matters I discussed in my specially concurring opinion in Burton v. State, 970 So.2d 229 (Miss.Ct.App.2007).
¶ 22. The jury found Wilson guilty of grand larceny based on the theft of a 2001 *1188Chevrolet 2500 Duramax four-wheel-drive truck, a sixteen-foot utility trailer, and two “zero-turn”…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hoops v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
- Nichols v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
- Pool v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 1998
- State v. LeeMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.