State v. Michaelson

Defendant appeals from convictions for perjury (Minn. St. 609.48), recording a forged instrument (Minn. St. 609.64), and receiving or concealing stolen property (Minn. St. 1971, § 609.53). He contends that (1) in refusing to suppress evidence which police seized in a search of his house, the trial court erred because these items were not named in the warrant; (2) the trial court erred in permitting the state to introduce evidence of another crime under the “common scheme or plan” exception to the exclusionary rule; and (3) the prosecutor committed prejudicial error in cross-examining…