Donlick v. Hults

Proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review a determination of the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, On this review of the revocation of petitioner’s motor Ambicie operator’s license for refusal to take a blood test after arrest for driving while intoxicated, the petitioner argues that there is “no substantial, competent evidence * * * to support a finding that petitioner knoAvingly refused to submit to a chemical test”, and that the finding of such a refusal is arbitrary and capricious. That petitioner refused to undergo a test after his arrest is abundantly…