Legal Opinion
In re Portell
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided September 9, 2016No. Case No. 12-44058-13PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SPEND INHERITANCE and DENYING THE TRUSTEE’S MOTION TO AMEND PLAN and ORDERING THAT THE DEBTORS OTHERWISE AMEND THEIR PLAN
Arthur B. Federman, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge
Chapter 13 Debtors Keith and Michele Portell filed a Motion to spend an inheritance which Keith Portell received postpe-tition. The Debtors are proposing to use a portion of the inheritance pay off all the debts on which Keith Portell is obligated, including the Debtors’ residential mortgage, and keep the rest of the funds; they do not plan to use the funds to pay the debts on which Michele Portell is…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Forbes v. Forbes (In Re Forbes)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Norwest Bank Nebraska, N.A. v. TvetenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- In Re Ida v. Reider and James M. Reider, Debtors. Ida v. Reider v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Kenneth Maynard Hanson & Lucille Esther Hanson v. First National Bank in Brookings, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Carol A. JohnsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Alaska · 2020
- In re: Carleton Jerome Beatty and Sharon Denise BeattyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2026
- James Young v. Happy Money, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2026