Legal Opinion

Byrd v. Haas

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided November 23, 2020No. 2:17-cv-11427Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION GERALD BYRD, Case No. 2:17-cv-11427 Plaintiff, HONORABLE STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III v. RANDALL HAAS, et al., Defendants. / OMNIBUS OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Gerald Byrd filed a pro se prisoner complaint in 2017 that alleged Defendants had violated his constitutional rights and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act ("RLUIPA"), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000cc, et seq. ECF 1. The Court previously granted summary judgment or qualified immunity in favor of Defendants Haas, Leach, McKee, and Umeh as to all claims for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Eloise HOWARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  3. Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Temujin Kensu v. Allen C. Haigh Tom Bell Yvonne Murzen Sandy Grant Linda HayesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  5. Randy Haight v. LaDonna ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API