Legal Opinion

Capital Equipment, Inc. v. Cnh America, LLC

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided April 28, 2006No. 5:04-cv-00381Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO CAPITAL EQUIPMENT, INC. AND RULING ON DAUBERT ISSUES

GARNETT THOMAS EISELE, District Judge.

Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant CNH America, LLC d/b/a New Holland Construction (hereinafter referred to as “NHC”), against Plaintiff Capital Equipment, Inc. (“Capital”). Capital has responded to the motion. Following a review of the entire summary judgment record, the Court concludes that Defendant’s motion must be granted in part and denied in part. The motion is granted with…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Petereit v. S.B. Thomas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  4. Holloway v. LockhartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  5. Great Earth International Franchising Corp. v. Milks DevelopmentDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API