Colquett v. Williams
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Per curiam
The history of this controversy is set out in the opinion of the Chief Justice which appears below. In our opinion, the *385facts there recited show that Colquett and Wishum are strangers to the proceeding in which the order or judgment sought to be subjected to examination here was made or rendered. Garrison v. Webb, 107 Ala. 499, 18 So. 297, 299. In the case just cited, it was said:
“ * * * We can no more revise or order the vacation of an interlocutory order, in which the parties thereto have acquiesced, by mandanwis, at the instance of a stranger to the suit or proceeding, than we could…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Griffin v. ProctorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. HayesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- Robinson Co. v. BeckSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Isaacs v. BoydSupreme Court of Alabama · 1837
- Moseley v. CollinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Williams v. ColquettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
- McDonald v. LyleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- Burks v. ZeanahCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1974
- Henderson ex rel. Henderson v. Illinois Central Gulf RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Colquett v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.