Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Ford v. Ahitow

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided June 2, 1995No. 94-2126PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

BAKER, Senior District Judge.

I

Robert Ford, the petitioner, is a prisoner in the Illinois Department of Corrections and has filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. At this time, the court grants the petition and orders the writ. This court finds that Ford is in “custody in violation of the Constitution ... of the United States.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a). Specifically, the state failed to prove the petitioner guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, and therefore the petitioner’s incarceration violates due process.

The Supreme Court has very recently restated that…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. O'NEAL v. McAninchSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. M. W. Holloway v. Clay E. McElroy WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  4. McCallum v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 11,951 Cathy Adelman-Tremblay v. Jewel Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Robert Ford, Jr. v. Rodney J. Ahitow, Warden, and Roland W. BurrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  2. In re Unborn ChildNew York Family Court · 1998
  3. State of Idaho, Dept. of Finance v. ClarkeDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API