Legal Opinion

Daniel v. . Dixon

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 1, 1913PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from O. H. Allen, J., at May Term, 1913, of Pitt.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.

This was an action to set aside and annul certain deeds. There was verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff, and the judgment was affirmed in this case, 161 N. C., 377. The defendants then filed their petition, under Revisal, 652, for betterments. The jury found that the defendants “had good reason to believe, and did believe, that at the time they were making improvements on the land they had a good title thereto,” and that “the premises ha.d been enhanced in value at this time by reason of said improvements $700.”

The only point presented is as to the correctness of the judgment. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pope v. . WhiteheadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
  2. Daniel v. . DixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  3. Collett v. . HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  4. Holt v. . CouchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  5. Whitfield v. . BoydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. . StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Layton v. . ByrdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Harris v. GilchristCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API