Legal Opinion

Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 25, 1913PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Franklin Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

William Rogers Clay,

Commissioner — Affirming.

Plaintiff, E. M. Williams, brought this action against defendants, Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company and *115Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, to recover the sum of $331.43 on account of alleged shortage in the weight of coal transported by them to Frankfort, Kentucky, from points in West Virginia and Eastern Kentucky. The law and facts were submitted to the court, and judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff against both defendants. The railroad companies appeal.

There are 38 carloads of coal involved. The bills of lading…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Bell v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
  3. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. RankinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Weil v. B. E. Buffaloe & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  2. McArthur v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  3. Income Life Insurance Co. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  4. Fitzpatrick's Administrator v. Citizens' Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  5. Makeever v. Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API