Legal Opinion

Aracena v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 10, 2016No. 2014-02323PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants separately appeal, as limited by their respective briefs, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Baynes, J.), dated December 6, 2013, as denied their separate motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.

The plaintiff alleges that he was injured when he tripped and fell on a sidewalk that abuts premises owned by the defendant 709 Bushwick Avenue, LLC (hereinafter…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Hausser v. GiuntaNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Vucetovic v. Epsom DownsNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Coogan v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Salisbury v. Elliott-LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Missirlakis v. McCarthyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  2. Gallis v. 23-21 33 Rd., LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  3. Koronkevich v. Alexander DembitzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  4. Ming Hsia v. ValleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  5. Kalajian v. 320 East 50th Street Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API