Legal Opinion
City of Milford v. Andresakis
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 30, 1999No. AC 18333PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying its motion for summary judgment on the defendants’ counterclaim.1 On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court failed to accord res judi-cata and collateral estoppel effect to a judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, which the plaintiff claims bars the defendants’ counterclaim alleging negligent misrepresentation. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to the resolution of this appeal. The plaintiff, the city of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- DeLaurentis v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Milton B. Russell v. Delco Remy Division of General Motors Corporation, Saegertown Manufacturing Company and Jordan ChalmerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- D'Ulisse-Cupo v. Board of Directors of Notre Dame High SchoolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Zizka v. Water Pollution Control AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Ancona v. Manafort Bros.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Cadle Co. v. GabelConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Singhaviroj v. Board of EducationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. Fitzgerald (In Re Fitzgerald)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1999
- Young v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.