Legal Opinion

United States v. Vilar

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 25, 2013No. 05 Cr. 621(RJS)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

RICHARD J. SULLIVAN, District Judge:

Now before the Court is Defendants’ motion seeking funds under the Criminal Justice Act of 1964, Pub.L. 88-455, 78 Stat. 552 (codified as amended at 18 U.S.C. § 3006A) (“CJA”), nunc pro tunc to pay for representation in a related civil case, Mayer v. J.P. Morgan Securities, LLC, 12 Civ. 5240(RJS). (Doc. No. 568.) For the reasons set forth below, the motion is denied.

I. BACKGROUND

Defendants were indicted in 2005 on charges including conspiracy to commit se*445curities fraud, investment advisor fraud, mail fraud, wire fraud, and money laundering. (Doc. Nos.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. United States v. MacCollomSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Turner v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bagley v. BennettDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2023
  2. Brooks v. DevereauxDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2024
  3. Williams v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
  4. Williams v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API