Roger Lee McQueen v. Harold R. Swenson, Warden, Missouri State Penitentiary
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
This appeal is the third time Roger McQueen’s petition for habeas relief has been before this court. The first instance was a direct appeal from the district court’s dismissal of McQueen’s petition, based upon the court’s finding that McQueen had been afforded effective assistance of counsel. 498 F.2d 207 (8th Cir. 1974). After a lengthy opinion, this court held that McQueen had demonstrated the failure of his trial counsel to perform an essential duty of investigation. Id. at 218. However, on the existing record, we were unable to determine whether McQueen’s defense had been prejudiced…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Roger Lee McQueen v. Harold R. Swenson, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- McQueen v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
- State v. McQueenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
- United States Ex Rel. Roger Lee McQueen v. Hon. H. Kenneth Wangelin, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
3Cited by5 opinions
- Grigsby v. MabryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- McQueen v. SwensonDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1976
- Nelson v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1981
- James T. Grigsby v. James Mabry, Commissioner, Arkansas Department of Correction, James T. Grigsby v. James Mabry, Commissioner, Arkansas Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- Roger Lee McQueen v. Harold R. Swenson, Warden, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977