Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided March 5, 1986No. CA CR 85-180PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant has appealed from her conviction of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver for which she was sentenced to a term of four years in the Department of Correction. Appellant’s brief does not comply with Rule 9(d) of the Rules of the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals.

Rule 9(d) requires that the appellant furnish us an abstract of the record containing a condensation of those material parts of the record which are necessary to an understanding by the court of all questions presented for decision. The main thrust of appellant’s argument is that the trial court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kitchen v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  2. Horne v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pearson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  2. Baldwin v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. McCarty v. Board of TrusteesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API