Hook v. Crowe
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
On exceptions by defendants. Assumpsit on account annexed to recover the price of awnings and a sash curtain- sold and delivered by the plaintiffs to the defendants. The action was brought in the Bangor Municipal Court and was submitted on an agreed statement of facts. Upon this agreed statement of facts, the Judge of that court ruled, pro forma, that the plaintiffs were entitled to recover, and to this ruling the defendants excepted.
Read the full summary
On exceptions by defendants. Assumpsit on account annexed to recover the price of awnings and a sash curtain- sold and delivered by the plaintiffs to the defendants. The action was brought in the Bangor Municipal Court and was submitted on an agreed statement of facts. Upon this agreed statement of facts, the Judge of that court ruled, pro forma, that the plaintiffs were entitled to recover, and to this ruling the defendants excepted. Thereupon in accordance with the provisions of chapter 211, section 6, Public Laws of 1895, the agreed statement of facts was certified to the Law Court. The…
1Opinion of the CourtSavage, J.
Action to recover the price of two awnings and one sash curtain, sold and delivered by the plaintiffs to the defendants. The agreed statement of facts shows that one Harry E. Hook, the selling agent of the plaintiffs, applied to the defendants for an order and that the defendants gave an order for the articles mentioned on condition that he, Harry F. Hook, would take the pay therefor in clothing and work out of defendants’ store, which he agreed to do. On the same day Hook delivered to the plaintiffs an unsigned order for the awnings upon one of their printed blanks. The goods were shipped to…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Eldridge v. FinnegarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909