Legal Opinion

Annett v. Salsberg

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided September 12, 1947PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cubiam.

These appeals are from determinations of the Supreme Court on certiorari affirming three convictions of appellant before the Recorder of River Yale, for violations of an ordinance of that township. The Supreme Court determined the' matter in an opinion by Mr. Justice Wachenfeld reported at 135 N. J. L. 122, and we concur in the reasoning and result of that opinion. Points are attempted to be raised on this appeal wdiich were not argued or raised in the Supreme Court, but this may not be done. Salisky v. Garfield, 132 Id. 144.

A further reason for affirmance in these cases arises…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. RussoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  2. State v. HomerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  3. State v. EH Miller Trans. Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  4. State v. AnnettNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API