Legal Opinion

State v. Keith

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 30, 1999No. 98-2796Published

1Per curiam

Because the defendant’s motion to dismiss was met with a traverse filed by the State that specifically denied material facts that were alleged in the motion, we find that the trial court erred by granting the motion to dismiss. See Boler v. State, 678 So.2d 319 (Fla.1996); State v. Aylesworth, 666 So.2d 181 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

Further, the defendant has properly conceded that the trial court erred by requiring the State to elect between either the organized fraud count or the grand theft counts. State v. Keith, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D987, 732 So.2d 9 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).

The order granting the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boler v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  2. State v. AylesworthDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. State v. KeithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API