Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re 12 Cornelia Street, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 9, 1981PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Dissent

Main and Mikoll, JJ.,

dissent and vote to reverse in the following memorandum by Mikoll, J. Mikoll, J. (dissenting). We respectfully dissent. The appellant corporation is engaged in the real estate business and as part of this endeavor engages real estate salesmen. The board held that the salesmen are employees of the corporation. At issue then is the question of whether the record supports such finding by substantial evidence. The board based its decision in part on an administrative regulation (19 NYCRR 175.21) implementing section 441 of the Real Property Law which it concluded required…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re McCabe & Willig Realty, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  2. In re the Claim of BarrettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  3. In re Van Waes & Associates Realty, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. The Matter of the Claim of Luis A. Vega v. Postmates IncNew York Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API