Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hall v. Industrial Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1985No. 19345Published

1DissentHall, Chief Justice

I do not join the main opinion because it violates the Court’s standard of review for factual issues. That standard precludes the substitution of our judgment for that of the Commission.

The Commission’s findings are not to be overturned unless they aré arbitrary or capricious, wholly without cause, contrary to the one inevitable conclusion from the evidence, or without any substantial evidence to support them.1 Application of this standard to the facts of the instant case dictates «affirmance of the order of the Commission.

The facts, as conceded by Hall, follow. Hall had not experienced any…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kaiser Steel Corp. v. MonfrediUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Kincheloe v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of OgdenUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Day's Market, Inc. v. MuirUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  4. US Fid. & Guar. Co. v. INDUS. COM'N OF UTAHUtah Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API