Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Kingston

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 30, 1960Published

1Dissent

Chief Judge Desmond (dissenting).

Defendant’s statements were in no sense “confessions ”. In common speech as in law a confession is “an acknowledgment * * * in express terms, of the fact of guilt ”, “a direct acknowledgment of guilt made by the defendant in a criminal prosecution ” (Richardson, Evidence [8th ed.], § 331; People v. Bretagna, 298 N. Y. 323, 325, 326; People v. Harris, 306 N. Y. 345, 350). For the protection of this defendant, on trial for a repulsive crime, it was imperative that it be clear to the jury that defendant, while he had disclosed his version of the infliction of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. MleczkoNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. People v. BretagnaNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  4. People v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  5. People v. DoriaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API