Legal Opinion

Bollinger v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 21, 2004No. ED 83294PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARY R. RUSSELL, Presiding Judge.

Jeffrey Bollinger (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment dismissing his motion for post-conviction relief as untimely. He asserts that the motion court erred in that his motion was filed within 90 days of the court’s denial of probation following his completion of a 120-day shock incarceration program. We disagree in that the motion court did not have jurisdiction to hear his untimely post-conviction motion, and thus, we also lack jurisdiction and are required to dismiss the appeal.

Movant pled guilty to the class D felonies of driving while revoked, section…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  2. McGlothlin v. Cullington, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
  3. Hall v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. State v. PendletonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Jameson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Oliver v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Bond v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Patterson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. State v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Tamell Campbell v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API