Legal Opinion

Southern Electric, Inc. v. Spall

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 10, 1961No. 30892Published

1Opinion of the Court

DREW, Justice.

The sole question presented in this workmen’s compensation case is whether the Florida Workmen’s Compensation Law1 authorizes reimbursement for damage to artificial members or prosthetic devices.

This is a case of first impression in this State but the answer is clearly discernible from the plain provisions of the Florida Law which limit coverage specifically to “personal injury or death by accident * * * and such diseases or infection as naturally or unavoidably result from such injury.”2 The act makes no provision of compensation for damages to artificial members or prosthetic…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
  2. Ratliff v. CubbageCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951
  3. California Casualty Indemnity Exchange v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Grond v. Wormann Apartments, New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API