Hanik v. Christopher & Banks, Inc.
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by Justice KELLER.
Kimberly Hanik (Hanik) appeals from an opinion by the Court of Appeals which reversed the Workers’ Compensation Board (the Board) and reinstated the opinion of the Administrative Law Judge (the ALJ). On appeal, Hanik argues that the Court of Appeals erred when it concluded that the Board engaged in impermissible fact finding. Christopher & Banks, Inc., Hanik’s employer, argues to the contrary. Having reviewed the record and the arguments of the parties,1 we affirm.
I. FACTS.
Kimberly Hanik (Hanik) was an assistant manager at Christopher & Banks, a retail…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Special Fund v. FrancisKentucky Supreme Court · 1986
- Paramount Foods, Inc. v. BurkhardtKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
- Ira A. Watson Department Store v. HamiltonKentucky Supreme Court · 2000
- Caudill v. Maloney's Discount StoresKentucky Supreme Court · 1977
- Ratliff v. EplingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Groce v. Vanmeter Contracting, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018