Legal Opinion
Taimanao v. Kim An Young
District Court, Northern Mariana Islands
Decided September 9, 1985No. DCA NO. 85-9001 CTC NO. 84-268Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BEFORE: LAURETA, DUEÑAS and WATERS*, District Judges LAURETA, District Judge:
Facts
The facts as found by the trial court are not challenged on appeal. On September 15, 1983, the plaintiffs-appel-lees, Maggie F. Taimanao and Norma Farinas, commenced working for the defendant Kim Kwang Young on twelve-month employment contracts. On November 14, 1983, Kim Kwang Young ordered both *287plaintiffs to work for his brother, the defendant-appellant Kim An Young, at Poppy's Night Club. After being threatened by Kim Kwang Young with legal action for breach of contract if they did not make the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- California Pacific Bank, a California Banking Corporation v. Small Business Administration, an Agency of the United States GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Office & Professional Employees International Union, Local 2 v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1982
- Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. MCI Telecommunications Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981