Legal Opinion
Corporation Holding Co. v. Wieber
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 19, 1930PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.
The three separate actions tried together were each brought to recover on a promissory note given by the respective defendants at different dates in September, 1929. These notes were payable three months after date to the order of David Campbell. The plaintiff alleged in the complaints that the notes respectively were sold and assigned to plaintiff who became the owner and holder thereof before maturity for a valuable consideration. The answers do not deny the making and delivery of the notes to Campbell, but deny that they were sold and assigned to the plaintiff. For a further defense the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Goshen National Bank v. BinghamNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Haverhill v. International Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- Haverhill v. International Railway CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- De Wolf v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Newcombe v. FoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bunge Corp. v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1971
- Sheehan v. Municipal Light & Power Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1943
- In re the Accounting of United States Trust Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1950
- Lamport Mfg. Supply Co. v. ReissAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1932