Rogers v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HARWOOD, Judge.
This appellant was tried under an indictment containing two counts. The first count charged larceny, and the second count charged embezzlement.
The jury returned a verdict of guilty under the second, or embezzlement count.
Prior to entering upon trial counsel for the appellant moved for a continuance on the ground that appellant was non compos mentis, and not capable of assisting or aiding her counsel in the preparation of her defense, thereby denying her a full hearing guaranteed by our State and federal Constitutions. Hearing was had upon this motion.
The evidence taken on the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Maund v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Wyatt v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1950
- Wall v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1911
- Fitzhugh v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1949
- Wyatt v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Shapard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1967
- Goldin v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
- Hinds v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
- United States v. Rutilio Lorenzo Petti, A/K/A Thomas GrassoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Cox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.