Legal Opinion
United States v. Chapman
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 10, 2008No. 07-3637, 07-3639PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
Darryl Chapman and John Frank each were convicted and sentenced for unrelated drug crimes. While serving their sentences, both men independently provided substantial assistance to the Government. Accordingly, the Government filed motions to reduce their otherwise final sentences under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b). The district court granted the Government’s motions, reducing Mr. Chapman’s sentence from 120 to 102 months and Mr. Frank’s sentence from 84 to 72 months. On appeal, the defendants contend that the district court failed to consider properly their…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. Karl CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. MirandaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Mattie Lou ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. ManellaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- United States v. ThornsburyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. PooleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Thomas Malone, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. GrantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.