Legal Opinion

Buddy L. Snead and Ligaya Snead v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 2, 1984No. 83-2326PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

This three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

This is an appeal from the decision of the tax court granting judgment on the pleadings in favor of the Commissioner. Petitioners brought the underlying action in the tax court for a redetermination of deficiencies assessed for the tax years 1978 and 1979.

Examination of the petition reveals that petitioners have failed to state any nonfrivolous…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Shirley NULF, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO., a New York Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
  4. United States v. L. Shyrl BrownCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  5. United States v. Omer W. WareCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Smith v. MCI Telecommunications Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1989
  2. John M. Casper v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  3. John L. Clark v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  4. Rothacker v. Rockwall County Central Appraisal DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
  5. In The Matter Of Lanceford C. BjellaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API