Legal Opinion
United States v. Kerr
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 14, 1932No. 6928PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NETERER, District Judge.
From a judgment after denial of a motion for directed verdict because (a) no disagreement existed on the claim made by the plaintiff for benefits under the policy sued on, and (,b) that there is no evidence to show total and permanent disability at any time from date of discharge, or at any other time, appeal is taken. The action was commenced upon a war risk insurance policy in the amount of $5,000. During the trial the court permitted amendment of the plaintiff upon automatic war risk insurance pursuant to the laws of the United States.
It is undisputed that appellee,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Le DucCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- United States v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
- Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. CollierCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Berntsen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
- United States v. RiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Matter of Baldwin-United Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1987
- United States v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Corrigan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- United States v. AlbertyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
- Cunningham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.