Legal Opinion

Parker v. Canfield

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided September 15, 1870PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Assumpsit against the defendants, as partners under the name of H. O. Andrews, upon sundry notes executed in that name, with the common counts; brought to the Superior Court in New Haven County. The following facts were found by a committee. The defendants were Henry O. Andrews, Jared H. Can-field and Hiram Hutchinson. Hutchinson resided out of the state and no service was made upon him. Canfield alone appeared and made defence.

Read the full summary

Assumpsit against the defendants, as partners under the name of H. O. Andrews, upon sundry notes executed in that name, with the common counts; brought to the Superior Court in New Haven County. The following facts were found by a committee. The defendants were Henry O. Andrews, Jared H. Can-field and Hiram Hutchinson. Hutchinson resided out of the state and no service was made upon him. Canfield alone appeared and made defence. The principal question in the case was, whether the defendants were partners at the time when the plaintiff’s claim accrued. Early in the year 1865 Andrews was…

1Opinion of the CourtSeymour, J.

During the year 1865 the defendants Can-field and Hutchinson became interested in the business which the defendant Andrews was engaged in at New Haven. From time to time during that year they furnished him with money as capital under an arrangement that they, Canfield and Hutchinson, should each furnish $5,000, and that they each should have one-sixth of the net ¿profits, and that the arrangement should continue till September 1st, 1868. The affairs of the company were to be under the management of Andrews, and carried on in his name. The details of the contract were however not fully…

2Cited by19 opinions

  1. Richardson v. . HughittNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Cothran v. Marmaduke & BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Morgan v. FarrelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
  4. Stevens & Andrews v. Gainesville National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Waggoner v. First National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1894

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API