Legal Opinion

Ocheltree v. Carl

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 13, 1867PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Ceder District Court. This is the case of a tenant suing his landlord for damages sustained by the trespassing animals of the latter. A recovery of $177,43 was had, and the defendant brings the cause here to have certain rulings of the court trying the same, reviewed.

1Opinion of the Court

Lowe, Oh. J.

The evidence under-which this case was put to the jury, shows the general features of the same, upon the facts, to be about as follows :

The defendant owned a large farm under one inclosure without division fences, a part of which he occupied and cultivated. Forty-nine acres thereof, more or less, he rented to plaintiff, who cultivated the same in corn, and was to have therefor two-thirds of the crop, and the defendant one-third. The crop was an average one for that year, say thirty-five bushels to the acre, worth from thirty to forty cents per bushel. These figures would make the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Magness v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899
  2. Hamer v. First National Bank of OgdenUtah Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Case v. Illinois Central R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1874
  4. McCornick v. SadlerUtah Supreme Court · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API