People v. Chaplin

The issue presented in this case is whether the prosecutor’s cross-examination of a key defense witness with regard to her activities as a prostitute was improper and so prejudicial as to warrant a reversal of the defendant’s convictions.

I

The defendant was charged with assault with intent to rob while armed 1 and with larceny of more than $100. 2 In addition, a supplemental information was filed charging that a conviction of either offense would be a third-felony conviction. 3

The defendant was tried before a jury on the assault and larceny charges. The jury convicted him of assault but…