Legal Opinion

Welch v. Verduin

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1923PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCheney, J.

This is an action for breach of promise of marriage. Defendant sets up the defense that the plaintiff was and is incapable of entering into the marriage state from physical causes; that plaintiff is malformed and is incapacitated from entering into and fulfilling the usual relations between husband and wife.

Those facts, if proved, would probably be a complete defense to the action. Haviland v. Halstead, 34 N. Y. 643. The marriage, if contracted, could be annulled on those grounds (Dom. Rel. Law, § 7), and no action will lie for breach of the contract, if the plaintiff was incapable of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McQuigan v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. R.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Goddard v. WestcottMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Haviland v. . HalsteadNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  4. Beans v. DennySupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  5. Hovey v. HoveyNew York Court of Chancery · 1836

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cowen v. CowenNew York Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Herskovitz v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API